Environmental impact of textile manufacturing

 

WOW! I started looking into the cost/environmental impact of producing textiles, and all I can say is I am absolutely dumbfounded! I looked at both cotton and polyester. In this blog post, I will look at the resources required to produce 1kg of cotton fiber and 1kg of polyester fiber. :

 

Cotton:

Depending on the growing area 1-3 bales of cotton can be produced per acre of land, a bale weighs approximately 500lbs. One bale of cotton can make around 1200 men's t-shirts (you can see more bale to item conversions here). Cotton is harvested with modern cotton-picking machines, these machines use rotating spindle to harvest cotton and then pass it along via a conveying system to a second machine that then removes the open bolls from the plant and finally the third machine receives the separated seed cotton and stores it until it is transferred to a separate storage container or vehicle.

Growing cotton uses a LOT of water. 20,000 liters (approximately 5300 gallons) or more is used to produce (from seed) 1kg of cotton fiber as well as about 450g of fertilizers, 16g of pesticides, and approx 60MJ (16.67kWh approx.) of energy to create. You also have to consider the fuel used sowing and harvesting the cotton as well as transporting the cotton to a factory and the kWh used to process and spin the cotton into fibers. You then have to take the fiber and manufacture a finished textile which will likely involve more water (dyeing) and electricity in several steps of the process (automated cutting, automated sewing, conveyance between these processes, etc.) and the shipping costs to get the good from a factory -> shipper -> warehouse -> store -> you. Just creating 1kg of cotton fiber generates 10-15kg of carbon dioxide emissions.

Polyester:

Polyester requires far fewer resources but is still mind-boggling. Polyester is synthetic, and it is produced from fossil fuels. Forgetting the necessary amount of energy to get oil out of the ground and refine it for use: 1kg of polyester requires approximately 1.5kg of oil, 17 liters of water, and just shy of 100MJ (27.75kWh approx.) of energy to create. Creating 1kg of polyester generates approximately 2.3kg of carbon dioxide emissions.

 

Guys! This is insane! I love cotton clothes, but WOW I'm going to focus on mostly synthetic fiber clothing going forward, and even then, the resource usage is just mind-boggling to produce a synthetic textile garment! I like 100% cotton because when a garment is no longer wearable, I could cut it up and compost it. Still, my research shows me most cotton-growing operations use absurd amounts of irrigation, which is just disruptive to the local environment as well as wherever the water is being trucked or piped in from. 

 

 

Some of my sources:

 

http://wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/about_freshwater/freshwater_problems/thirsty_crops/cotton/

http://www.sustainability-ed.org.uk/pages/example4-3.htm

http://cottonaustralia.com.au/cotton-library/fact-sheets/cotton-fact-file-water


Update, September 4th 2017:

So I got a little curious and wanted to try and get an idea of what 1 acre of cotton means in yield, also what sort of global power demand producing cotton fiber from the ground up looks like.

There are something like 167 million acres of cotton planted worldwide, that's more than 261,000 square miles of cotton. It looks like 29 million tons of cotton are produced a year right now, that's 133,195,950 bales. That's roughly 1.25 bales per acre, so 272kg pounds of cotton per acre. A quick google search shows 6-9.5 ounces per t-shirt, giving you an estimate of 1238 t-shirts per acre.

So if we look at averages, you need a season and an acre of land to make a bit over 272kg of t-shirts. For that 272kg of t-shirts, you'd also need about 1.4 million gallons of water, 122kg of fertilizers, 4.3kg of pesticides, and approximately 4534 kWh of electricity (average American household in 2015 had an electricity consumption of about 10,812 kilowatt-hours). That means the 167 million acres of cotton being grown worldwide uses about 757 TWh of electricity to make cotton fibers. Total world electricity consumption was 19,504 TWh in 2013, that's like 3.8% of the world's power consumption just to get from an open field to spun cotton fibers.

Insanity.

Update, July 3rd 2018:

There's a problem with polyester. Polyester itself is a source of pollution. 

First, the manufacturing process results in a host of carcinogenic compounds being used (and in parts of the world with lax regulation, being released into the environment) as well as the fact that during the washing process, you are introducing microplastics/microfibers to the environment. One article states that as much as 85% of human-made materials found on the shoreline are microfibers like nylon and acrylic, which are ubiquitous fibers for textile production. Ouch! 

While the danger of microplastics as environmental contaminants is still widely unknown, more and more studies are being conducted to see the extent of damage already done as well as future implications. One fact for sure, though, is we are creating a new geological age which some geologists wish to call the 'Anthropocene' epoch, which includes changes such as anthropogenic climate change and the introduction of synthetic materials into not just landfills but ecosystems the world over. This is concerning. 

We also have the fact that 70 billion barrels of oil are used each year to manufacture just polyester! Insanity! With an ever-growing population, what are we to do? Cotton isn't a realistic answer, synthetic and most (if not all?) artificial fibers have long-term environmental ramifications due to the way they break down and linger. Sure, we have discovered that mealworms can digest some synthetic materials into environmentally safe products, but that will only help a fraction of a percent in dealing with this problem in any realistically scalable attempt.

Yet another problem we need to start thinking long and hard about.

 

 

I bought a Chromebook, and am dual booting linux!

For those of you not familiar with Chromebooks, check out Google's page on them. I encountered a Chromebook for the first time in the wild this past Saturday and was quite impressed with how snappy and functional for casual web browsing they were.  A little bit of research later that afternoon I discovered several (the Intel ones) are capable of running Linux with minimal effort. After doing a fairly quick Google search I found that the Acer Chromebook CB3-131-C3SZ 11.6-Inch Laptop would allow support for dual booting Chrome OS and Linux if I flashed the rom with a custom one. 

 

I decided to go with Gallium OS as my Linux distro as it is made, and optimized, for use on Chromebooks. Acer Chromebook CB3-131-C3SZ 11.6-Inch Laptop would allow support for dual booting Chrome OS and Linux if I flashed the ROM with a custom one. Flashing the ROM for this specific device was easy:

  • At the Chrome OS screen I logged into my WiFi network but NOT the OS.

  • Opened a crosh shell by pressing CTRL+ALT+F2(which is actually just a right arrow where the F2 key should be)

  • Logged in as 'chronos' with no password

  • Followed the instructions on https://johnlewis.ie/custom-chromebook-firmware/rom-download/ which download and install the firmware ROM for the chipset my model has. I went with 'RW_LEGACY' as it allows dual booting.

This flashed the rom and I then powered the machine off and turned it back on just to be safe before proceeding to the next step. I was now ready to install Gallium OS! This was equally as simple:

  • At the Chrome OS screen I logged into my WiFi network but NOT the OS again

  • Opened a crosh shell via Ctrl+ALT+F2 again

  • Logged in as 'chronos' with no password again

  • Then ran the chrx install script 'curl -Os https://chrx.org/go && sh go' which downloaded the install script and gave me a few options for the install, like setting the partition size (I gave 9 of the 12gb to it as recommended).

After about 15 minutes it had downloaded the distro and installed and bam there I was at the Gallium OS log in screen! It works great. Now when I turn on my Chromebook I have 30 seconds to select which OS I want by pressing either 'CTRL + D' for Chrome OS or by pressing 'CTRL + L' for Linux, if I do not select one within 30 seconds it automatically launches Chrome OS! I've read you can change the default as well as the time but it's not a big deal, within 1 second of pressing the power button you are at the screen then it's just a quick tap. Chrome OS takes about 9 seconds to load now from pressing 'CTRL+D' and Gallium OS takes roughly twice as long after pressing 'CTRL+L' to be at the log-in screen!

I have to say, this Acer Chromebook is a great little machine. Its housing is plastic but it makes a great little machine for browsing the web, chatting, using pushbullet to text etc while I sit on the couch watching TV or while sitting in a coffee shop people watching out the window! 

LEGO 31032-1: Red Creatures, reimagined

So a discussion came up on /r/lego about doing 31032-1: Red Creatures in other colours, I decided I wanted to do one by replacing all the red with black

LEGO 31032 black MOC
LEGO 31032 black MOC 2

I ended up not being happy with the black spines on black body, fortunately these trans orange slopes had been on the pick a brick wall here in Indy recently and I had grabbed several hundred of them to fill empty space in a cup. I'll admit I'm biased as it's my creation but I really like the orange on black way better than The LEGO Group's black on red.

LEGO 31032 black MOC 3
LEGO 31032 black MOC 4

Becoming a Better Man

I'm currently working on becoming a better man. How am I doing this? Lots of ways! 

  • Drastically giving up television, I've currently divorced half of the currently airing shows I watch and am working on divorcing nearly all of them, I'll always enjoy some television though.
  • Reading more, I used to read a TON and I just kinda stopped. I've been reading an hour a night on average before bed and I want to increase that. Currently I'm finishing John Scalzi's Old Man's War series and have roughly 50 other, mostly hard science fiction, books queued up to read next, all multi-title series. I also want to start spending more time reading Masonic texts, shooting for at least a half hour a night before my science fiction reading.
  • Lose weight, I need to lose at least 100lbs and in the past week I've drastically reduced my portions, I've got granola at my desk at work that I can eat a pinch of when I want to go raid the vending machine and I've also been keeping some slimfast in my desk to keep me from ordering a foot-long and cookies from subway days I want something more for lunch.
  • Generally being more pleasant, I'm trying to be more cheery. Saying good morning to people, keeping my negative thoughts to myself etc.
  • Looking for a new Lodge, after writing Speedway Lodge No. 729, dead at 76 I've decided it's time to find a new Lodge. I'm visiting two next month, one of which I'm very very excited about!

That's all for now! 

Coalition to Save Freemasonry in Indiana

A group, or person, has identified as the 'Coalition to Save Freemasonry in Indiana' and have sent a letter out to WM's here in Indiana. The letter can be found below in this blog post. I'd really love if someone from this 'coalition' could reach out to me. Several things they addressed in their letter had me nodding or are things I've already thought/been concerned about. Freemasonry in Indiana is getting downright silly. The Powers That Be have been driving Indiana Freemasonry into the ground the decade and change I've been a Mason in Indiana and it's saddening. I want to see a return to our early roots as Freemasons in America. I want to see changes. I want to help bring about that change. I can't do it alone and I don't even know how to go about finding like minded Masons. 

This week my Lodge changes from Speedway #729 to Speedway #500 purely out of vanity. Seriously, we are getting a new charter so that we can take #500 because we are down the road from the Indianapolis Motor Speedway... membership declines in Indiana, ritual is stumbled through at many a Lodge, members regularly fail to return after they are raised... but the GL thought it was a good idea to offer us the ability to change from #729, after 77 years of history, to #500 for vanity. This means a new charter, this means a new signing, this means time wasted by dozens of Brothers to bring about this change. Then this letter surfaces bringing to light many far far more concerning issues. Please, would someone from the Coalition to Save Freemasonry in Indiana reach out to me, if anything it would be nice to have someone to vent to. 

Even if you aren't a member (or the sole individual) of the Coalition to Save Freemasonry in Indiana, and are just a like minded individual that is concerned by the above issues (or similar ones) and are a member of the GL of Indiana, please reach out. Lets talk, lets get together and have a cup of coffee or a bite to eat and discuss some of our concerns. Lets see if we can't start to be the change we want to see in Indiana Freemasonry. Maybe we can start a club and come together once or twice a month to be better Brothers and go to our Blue Lodges monthly and be the change. Comment here, or drop me a message via the Contact link in the top right corner of this site. 

 

Medical Care

Someone on a reddit thread was whining about already being at their 5k deductible this year and how they'd have to pay 400$ to their neurologist tomorrow for their appointment... this started as a reply to them but I decided to write it here instead

Why (all) medical care isn't a right, and why it cannot be with our current level of technological achievement:

Most medical care is a privilege. It is a luxury. Calm down calm down, just hear me out. Having someone set a broken bone should be a 'right', certain mental health care should be a 'right' as a mentally unwell person can be a detriment to society around them. If something involves a scalpel, cancer treatment etc is a privilege and should remain such.

Setting a broken bone is something a fairly unskilled individual can perform and leave the individual with the broken bone having fairly good functionality of that limb when it heals. Most surgery requires a half dozen or more people, a sterile environment, hundreds of thousands of dollars (or millions of dollars) of specialized equipment, all sorts of consumables (paper gowns, gloves, gauze, betadine, anesthetics, staples etc) and absolutely should not be free or subsidized.

We aren't to a technological point where all medical care, or even most medical care, is something inexpensive that can be a 'right'. In the next several decades, or century, this is going to change. There are now robots that can perform some surgical procedures with zero input from doctors (mostly sutures and the like), medical technology gets better and better and eventually will reach a point where it largely stops improving and then you'll start to see the cost come down as production methods allow the machines and instruments to be made cheaper and cheaper. THEN, most medical care starts to become a right as it becomes more and more automated and requires less and less education.

With the way the technology is now, demanding cheap or free healthcare for the masses is like demanding the top violinist in the world to come and teach every child that wants to play the violin for free. Or demanding that the best mechanics in the world work on your car for free. Or that the plumber, the electrician, the carpenter should come and work for free or for pennies on the dollar. Starfleet doesn't exist, these are not the voyages of the Starship Enterprise. Society is not at a point where we can offer such services free to all because they are skilled trades with expensive equipment and lengthy educational requirements.

71012-0: LEGO Minifigures - The Disney Series

Another great start to a weekend, completed my Disney LEGO MInifigure series!